The Creature List

2007-03-06 [Linn Scarlett]: Does it matter XD Everybody spells it phoenix/pheonix/phoenixi/pheoniks/phoeniks
so reaaly :P

2007-03-06 [Linderel]: It matters because the correct spelling is 'phoenix'.

2007-03-06 [Linn Scarlett]: Says who? I've several books on mythic beasts all claiming the oposite of eachother...

2007-03-06 [Linderel]: Says the dictionary. I believe the dictionary. :P

2007-03-06 [Linn Scarlett]: It wasn't my mistake XD
Which reminds me *tugs xido's sleeve* why is my other favorite being, ze Erlking, not present?

2007-03-07 [xido]: PHEONIX is my bad. Sorry. Change it to Phoenix Description, since Phoenix is an Xmen-fanfic wiki about the character, Phoenix (or Jean Grey, who had a similarly misspellable last name = grey/gray).

As for she-who-tugs-on-my-arm.....  Why are you tugging at me? I've never heard of that beastie. You may add as you wish, provided Angel does not throw fits of rage and death.

To Angel, there is a calling for Sci-Fi Fiction beasties. What say you to that idea?
-will

2007-03-07 [Linderel]: 'Gray' and 'grey' are actually both correct. It's the British/US thing again.
Of course, you were probably talking about the character name, which should be one or the other. But I couldn't help myself. xD

2007-03-08 [xido]: Helpful page: http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/lists/monsters A Monster Index from Wizards.com

btw, Linn, what is an 'Erlking' anyways?

2007-03-08 [xido]: Anyone who wants to help on the dragon page is asked to comment on draco_tp, the template page for Dracology and the Draconic Clan in preparation for a future ECM session on Dragons. ;)

2007-03-09 [Linn Scarlett]: it's a nordic/germanic (i believe) folklore creature, not unlike the banshee. Only it's supposedly only one (in existance) and he , the 'elf king' as it is often translated, shows himself only to the person that is about to die. His demeanor and expression would tell how one was about to die. That's it in a nutshell.

2007-03-10 [xido]: Very cool. I like it. ;)
-will

2007-03-10 [Angel Dreamer]: On sci-fi creatures: I think as long as they're actual creatures and not, say, intelligent computer programs, then it's all good. On erlkings: I've heard of them, and no fits or rages of death will come from this direction on the addition.

2007-03-24 [Linn Scarlett]: *nod* great, because I adore them and the poem Goethe wrote about one *fiddles around and pricks a date in her agenda to make a page about em*

2007-03-28 [Linderel]: Has anyone noticed that the 'back to top'-things don't work?

2007-03-29 [windowframe]: ...Works for me. O.o

2007-03-29 [Linderel]: *blink* Now that's odd.

2007-04-06 [Linn Scarlett]: Works for me too Lind

2007-04-07 [Linderel]: Yeah, apparently it's my browser thinking that it's not a valid link and ignoring it.

2007-04-07 [xido]: Yay, SciFi! [Veltzeh] will be so happy. ;)
-will

2007-04-07 [Veltzeh]: Now the only question is about whether specific sci-fi species created by some companies are allowed... but seeing as at least "drow" and "hobbits" are here, I'd suppose so.

2007-04-08 [Veltzeh]: Also, should the name of the wikipage that leads to a descriptive page be singular or plural (should it be "cyborg" or "cyborgs")?